How to compare your brand across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity traffic, in one ask
The five-segment cycle: pick a segment, read share and mentions, pick the next, repeat until Perplexity. The whole sweep is one sentence.
Before, the dashboard ritual
5 segments × 4 menus each · 1 notepad
- Open the Competitive dashboard
- Segment: Claude referrals
- Read share and mentions
- Switch segment: ChatGPT referrals
- Switch segment: Gemini referrals
- Switch segment: AI Mode referrals
- Switch segment: Perplexity referrals
- Reconcile five readings by hand
After, one question
Compare my branded share and mentions across my Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, AI Mode and Perplexity referral segments for the last week.
Paste it into Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor with Quattr MCP connected. No tool names, no field names, routing is the assistant's job.
The answer
Compare my branded share and mentions across my five AI-referral segments for the last week.
Analysis plan, every step, resolved for you
- Routed to the governed workflow
market-share-review - Dates bound explicitly
Jul 26 to Aug 1, 2026 - 2 analyses queued in parallel
market_share_overview (per segment) · competitive_trends (brand_mentions) - Honesty gates armed
scope echo · freshness
One segment carries the AI-referral story; two are flat.
- Branded mentions
- 1,284 ▲ +11% across 5 AI-referral segments
- Strongest segment
- ChatGPT referrals these are referral-traffic segments, not answer-engine citation metrics
Jul 26 to Aug 1, 2026 vs prior weekbranded
⚠ Observationalas of Aug 1, 2026IllustrativeOpen in Quattr ↗
Segments resolve by name, five dashboard cycles became a list in a sentence.
A simulated conversation on fictional data, composed from this workflow's scenario by the same director that renders every demo on this site, scope, freshness and the ⚠ Observational marker are attached automatically, not written by hand.