How to map where a competitor out-ranks or out-covers you in search, the full gap table
The coverage question used to be a manual keyword-by-keyword reconciliation. The losing / winning / not-ranked buckets arrive in one sentence.
Before, the dashboard ritual
7 steps · 3 menus · 1 long reconcile
- Open the Competitive dashboard
- Segment: Overall Market
- Dates: last 30 days
- Metric: Ranked keywords
- Pick the rival
- Drilldown → Intent
- Reconcile coverage by hand
After, one question
Where does my closest rival out-rank or out-cover us, keyword by keyword, losing, winning, and not-ranked?
Paste it into Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor with Quattr MCP connected. No tool names, no field names, routing is the assistant's job.
The answer
Where does my closest rival out-rank or out-cover us, losing, winning, and not ranked?
Analysis plan, every step, resolved for you
- Routed to the governed workflow
keyword-gap-audit - Scope resolved before filtering
segment: Overall Market · Jul 2 to Jul 31, 2026 - 1 analysis queued
seo_keyword_gap_analysis - Honesty gates armed
scope echo · freshness
You're losing on 214 keywords and absent on 96, the gap map is your content queue.
- Keywords losing
- 214 rival ranks better
- Not ranked at all
- 96 demand-weighted worklist on request
Gainers
- You out-rank on 41 keywords ▲ 41
- Both rank, you lead by 3+ ▲ 18
Losers
- They out-rank you ▼ 67
- They rank, you do not ▼ 29
Of 214 tracked keywords; 77 where neither ranks are not shown.
Jul 2 to Jul 31, 2026organicsegment: Overall Market
⚠ Observationalas of Aug 1, 2026IllustrativeOpen in Quattr ↗
Buckets, not vibes, each gap carries its size, ready to prioritize.
A simulated conversation on fictional data, composed from this workflow's scenario by the same director that renders every demo on this site, scope, freshness and the ⚠ Observational marker are attached automatically, not written by hand.