UC-04 Weekly SEO leadContent leadExec

AI visibility standing

Leadership has started asking whether ChatGPT mentions you. You want a per-engine read, not one blended number that hides which engine actually cites you.

What you'd type

How visible are we across AI answer engines?
What is our citation rate on ChatGPT vs Perplexity?
Are our AI citations trending up or down?

You never name a skill or a tool. The assistant routes on what you asked. Run it on your own data →

What comes back

Use case: AI visibility standing Simulated · illustrative

How visible are we across AI answer engines?

Analysis plan, every step, resolved for you

Routed to the governed workflowai-visibility-pulse
Scope resolved before filteringsegment: AI Tracker · Jul 2026
1 analysis queuedai_visibility_overview
Honesty gates armedscope echo · freshness

Citation rate by answer engine312 tracked prompts · non-brand

Engine	Citation rate	Δ vs Jun	Positive mentions
Perplexity	31.4%	▲ +4.2 pts	68%
Google AI Mode	18.9%	▲ +1.1 pts	61%
ChatGPT	11.2%	▼ −2.8 pts	57%
Gemini	9.6%	, flat	64%

Jul 2026 vs Jun 2026segment: AI Tracker

⚠ Observationalas of Aug 1, 2026 (AI visibility loads ~1 day behind)IllustrativeOpen in Quattr ↗

Perplexity is doing the work. The ChatGPT slide is the one to explain before it becomes the headline.

A simulated conversation on fictional data. Scope, freshness and the ⚠ Observational marker are attached by the same director that renders every demo on this site.

Which surface each number belongs to

Answer-engine citations and Google's on-SERP AI Overviews are different surfaces measured different ways. Every figure here names its engine, and neither is rolled into the other.

What's behind it

Analyses it runs

ai_visibility_overview
ai_visibility_trend
ai_visibility_competitors

Sources it reads

AI visibility

The skills that own this

The dashboard rituals it replaces

Going deeper

Next use case AI crawler readiness →

See this use case run for real

All runs →