Quattr leads AEO, SEO, and content rankings on G2 Spring 2026. View our G2 badges →
Request demo
Request demo

raw measure keywords · higher is better

Winning keywords

also called Winning bucketKeywords we lead on

Definition

Tracked keywords where you rank at or above the best tracked competitor.

How it's calculated

A keyword falls into the winning bucket when your rank exists and the gap to the best tracked competitor is zero or negative. Up to 25 rows are returned; the bucket total is reported separately and is not capped.

Scope, grain and dimensions

Grain
One tracked segment × the date range.
Dimensions
query · competitor domain · segment
Required filters
segment_id · date range
Aggregation
A count of keywords, partitioning with the losing and not-ranked buckets.
Metric type
raw measure · keywords

Data sources

Where you'll see this

Named reports that normally include this metric.

Competitor search report

Skills and analyses that use it

Skills carry the judgment; the analysis verbs do the reading.

Analysis verbs

seo_keyword_gap_analysis

Method rungs and levers

R2 Retrieved

A rung tells you what a movement here can and cannot explain, read the rungs below it first.

levers L2 Demand modelingL3 Refresh & content quality

Ask Quattr

How to read it

Ground to defend, and the counterweight to a gap list that would otherwise read as an all-loss picture. A winning keyword is a position held on a given window, not a position secured.

Caveats, freshness and failure modes

A tie is counted as winning: a gap of exactly zero falls on this side of the split.

Winning means ahead of the best TRACKED competitor; an untracked rival above you both is invisible here.

The returned rows are capped at 25 while the total is not, so the list under-describes the bucket by design.

The rank measure floors to zero on a row with no impressions, and a zero rank produces a negative gap, so that artifact lands here rather than in the losing bucket.

Freshness
~1 day behind, daily observation, available the following day.

Common failure modes

  • Reading a tie-heavy winning count as clear leadership.
  • Presenting the winning count as a share of the market.

Verification

Last verified 2026-08-04 · reference version 1.1 { } This metric as JSON ↗