Quattr leads AEO, SEO, and content rankings on G2 Spring 2026. View our G2 badges →
Request demo
Request demo

derived metric CTR points as a 0 to 1 fraction · higher is better

Modeled CTR gain to a target position

also called CTR upliftCurve gain

Definition

The extra click-through rate this site's own curve predicts for a keyword if it moved from where it ranks now to a target position.

How it's calculated

ctrGain = max(0, expectedCtr(target) − expectedCtr(current)) evaluated on the row's own fitted curve. The floor at zero is safe because the fit is monotone-decreasing, so a target above the current position can never predict a loss.

Scope, grain and dimensions

Grain
One keyword × one page × the current-to-target pair.
Dimensions
query · page · brand · intent · device · position
Required filters
date range
Aggregation
Row-level; it is an input to the upside figures rather than something to aggregate on its own.
Metric type
derived metric · CTR points as a 0 to 1 fraction

Data sources

Where you'll see this

Named reports that normally include this metric.

CTR opportunity reportSearch opportunity report

Skills and analyses that use it

Skills carry the judgment; the analysis verbs do the reading.

Analysis verbs

striking_distance

Method rungs and levers

R2 Retrieved

A rung tells you what a movement here can and cannot explain, read the rungs below it first.

levers L3 Refresh & content qualityL4 Internal linking & architecture

Ask Quattr

How to read it

The per-impression part of the upside story. It says nothing about how hard the move is, the curve models what happens if a position changes, never whether it will.

Caveats, freshness and failure modes

The target position is a default (5) and a knob. Changing it changes every number in the worklist, so the target belongs beside the result.

Rows already at or above the target are excluded from the candidate set rather than modeled at a gain of zero.

Both ends of the gain come from the same fitted curve, so a low-confidence cell makes the gain unreliable at both ends at once.

Freshness
1 to 2 days behind, Google's own reporting lag. Any answer touching the last 48 hours says so on the card.

Common failure modes

  • Comparing two worklists built with different target positions.
  • Reading a gain as achievable without any assessment of ranking difficulty.

Verification

Last verified 2026-08-04 · reference version 1.1 { } This metric as JSON ↗