Quattr leads AEO, SEO, and content rankings on G2 Spring 2026. View our G2 badges →
Request demo
Request demo

Utilities

How to diagnose when a number looks off

quattr-troubleshooter a saved expert workflow your assistant follows, in Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor

First-line diagnosis when something looks wrong: "no data", "numbers don't match GSC/QWA", auth or entitlement confusion, a feed that seems stale, the tracking-gap vs data-lag vs real-change ladder, ending fixed or with a support-ready summary.

Try it

something looks off

Private beta Part of the quattr-ai-search plugin, rolling out org by org. Request access ↗

Say any of these

  • no data showing
  • this number looks wrong
  • doesn't match Search Console
  • getting an access error
  • seems broken
  • data is missing
  • why is this empty
  • I can't see my segment

You never name the skill or a tool, the assistant routes on what you asked. These are the phrasings it recognises for this one.

And when it stays out of the way

Not for a real performance drop ("clicks fell", anomaly-investigator), or for first-run tours (quattr-onboarding).

Use it instead of quattr-iq when something looks BROKEN; use quattr-iq instead when you want to understand how a number is defined.

What it runs

  • describe_data_sources
  • get_data_freshness
  • resolve_entity
  • list_filter_values
  • get_query_history
  • explain_analysis

6 governed analyses, composed and scoped for you. Named here for transparency, not because you have to ask for them.

The numbers behind it

What it refuses to do

  • Never blame the data to avoid saying "real change", and never say "real change" before rungs 1 to 5 are cleared, the ladder runs in order.
  • Cross-source level-matching is a known false-alarm generator: reconciliation language is about trends and scoping, not penny-matching [E1 cluster 1].
  • When unresolved, the support summary states what was ruled OUT, that is the value handed to support.

What the answer looks like

Skill: When something looks wrong, diagnose. Simulated · illustrative

Why is this empty?

Analysis plan, every step, resolved for you

  • Routed to the governed workflowquattr-troubleshooter
  • Dates bound explicitlyJul 29 to Aug 1, 2026
  • 3 analyses queued in parallelget_data_freshness · describe_data_sources · get_query_history
  • Honesty gates armedscope echo · freshness

Not broken, and not a tracking gap, you asked for days GSC hasn't loaded yet.

Diagnosis
data lag tracking-gap vs data-lag vs real-change ladder, rung 2
GSC loaded through
Jul 30 your range ends Aug 1
Fix
end the range at Jul 30 or wait for tonight's load

Jul 29 to Aug 1, 2026

⚠ Observationalas of Aug 1, 2026 (GSC lags 1 to 2 days)IllustrativeOpen in Quattr ↗

Still empty after the load? This becomes a support-ready summary, one click.

A simulated conversation on fictional data. Scope, freshness and the ⚠ Observational marker are attached by the same director that renders every demo here, not written by hand.

Want this Skill running on your own accounts? Every Quattr customer works with an AI Search Strategist who sets it up with you.

Consult an expert