Organic
How to check how search is doing in 30 seconds
search-pulse a saved expert workflow your assistant follows, in Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor
The 30-second cross-channel verdict: organic clicks week-over-week, search market share vs the leader, AI citation rate, winning / holding / slipping, one card, one number each.
Try it
how's search doing
Private beta Part of the quattr-ai-search plugin, rolling out org by org. Request access ↗
Say any of these
search pulsehow's search doingquick checkjust the headlineare we up or down this weekmorning check-inTLDR on searchhow are we doing
You never name the skill or a tool, the assistant routes on what you asked. These are the phrasings it recognises for this one.
And when it stays out of the way
Not when you ask WHY something moved (that is anomaly-investigator), wants a full report or audit, or asks about one channel in depth.
Use it instead of weekly-search-report or aeo-audit when you want just the headline; use anomaly-investigator instead the moment they ask for causes.
What it runs
search_performancemarket_share_overviewai_visibility_citation_audit
3 governed analyses, composed and scoped for you. Named here for transparency, not because you have to ask for them.
The numbers behind it
Metrics it reads, each defined in the reference
AI citation rateGap to leaderOrganic clicksOrganic impressionsSearch market share
Reports these numbers feed
AI Overview and SERP feature reportAI visibility reportCannibalization reportCompetitor search reportContent decay reportContent performance reportCore Web Vitals reportCTR opportunity reportInternal linking reportKeyword ranking and movement reportMonthly executive search reportPaid and organic overlap reportSearch market share reportSearch opportunity reportSearch to revenue reportSERP volatility and algorithm update reportTechnical SEO audit reportWeekly search report
What it refuses to do
- Never expand the pulse into a breakdown, even when a tile looks alarming, offer the sibling skill instead.
- A one-week move is usually noise: the verdict word describes the week; only significance-checked language may call a change real, and the pulse doesn't run significance, it offers anomaly-investigator.
- Market share is named in qualified form on first use: CTR-modeled search market share of tracked demand, directional.
What the answer looks like
Are we up or down this week?
Analysis plan, every step, resolved for you
- Routed to the governed workflow
search-pulse - Dates bound explicitly
Jul 26 to Aug 1, 2026 - 3 analyses queued in parallel
search_performance · market_share_overview · ai_visibility_citation_audit - Honesty gates armed
scope echo · freshness
Holding, clicks dipped within noise, share flat, citations up.
- Organic clicks
- 41.2K ▼ −4.2% within normal weekly wobble
- Market share
- 4.8% ▬ 0.0 pts CTR-modeled, of tracked demand
- Citation rate
- 18.9% ▲ +0.7 pts answer engines, tracked prompts
Jul 26 to Aug 1, 2026 vs prior week
⚠ Observationalas of Aug 2, 2026 (GSC lags 1 to 2 days)IllustrativeOpen in Quattr ↗
Verdict: holding. Nothing here warrants a cause hunt.
A simulated conversation on fictional data. Scope, freshness and the ⚠ Observational marker are attached by the same director that renders every demo here, not written by hand.
See this Skill inside a real analysis
All runs →A recorded run where this Skill does the work, the prompts as typed, and the decision that came back.
Want this Skill running on your own accounts? Every Quattr customer works with an AI Search Strategist who sets it up with you.